History of Interior Architecture DIA1000 代写

History of Interior Architecture DIA1000 代写


History of Interior Architecture DIA1000 04 4 Knoll Showroom, San Francisco, designed by Florence Knoll, 1954 Semester 2, 2017 Teaching Staff: Dolores O’Grady Daniel Huppatz 1 1 DIA10004 History of Interior Architecture – Semester 2 2017 Lecture Program  Thursdays 1:30-2:30 Room: AGSE 207 Week 1: Thursday 3 August Lecture: INTRODUCTION: HISTORY OF INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE Tutorial: What is history? What is interior architecture? Reading: Sanders, “Curtain Wars” Week 2: Thursday 10 August Lecture: INTERIORITY Tutorial: What is interiority? Reading: Hartzell, “The Velvet Touch” and Benjamin, “Louis-Philippe or the Interior” Week 3: Thursday 17 August Lecture: DWELLING Tutorial: What is the relationship between humans and space? Reading: Heidegger, “Building, Dwelling, Thinking” Week 4: Thursday 24 August Lecture: SACRED SPACE – Guest lecture by Flavia Marcello Tutorial: What is sacred space? What is its relationship with geometry? Reading: Vitruvius, from the “Ten Books of Architecture”, Unwin, “Ideal Geometry” Week 5: Thursday 31 August Lecture: HOUSE I: THE DOMESTIC INTERIOR Tutorial: What is privacy? What is comfort? Reading: Rybczynski, from Home: the Short History of an Idea Week 6: Thursday 7 September Lecture: TRADITIONS: NATIONAL, REGIONAL, LOCAL Tutorial: How do interior spaces reflect social and political identities? Readings: Jackson & Barnes, “A Significant Mirror of Progress”, Woolley, “Australianness and Regionalism” MID-SEMESTER BREAK (Monday 11 Sept – Friday 15 Sept) 2 2 Week 7: Thursday 21 September Lecture: POLITICAL SPACE – Guest lecture by Flavia Marcello Tutorial: How is power enacted in interior spaces? Reading: Dovey, “Power”, from Framing Places Week 8: Thursday 28 September Lecture: TRADITIONS: CULTURAL AND CROSS-CULTURAL Tutorial: How do different cultures understand interior space? Readings: Tanizaki, from In Praise of Shadows, Kashiwagi, “On Rationalisation and the National Lifestyle” Week 9: Thursday 5 October Lecture: HOUSE II: MEANING, SYMBOLISM AND NARRATIVES Tutorial: What is the meaning of home? Readings: Bachelard, from The Poetics of Space, Sparke, “The Private Interior” Week 10: Thursday 12 October Lecture: INDIGENOUS SPACE Tutorial: How do indigenous cultures understand interior space? Reading: Memmott, “The Way it Was: Customary Camps and Houses”, Jangala, “Malikijarrakurlu” (The Two Dogs) Week 11: Thursday 19 October Lecture: HOUSE III: A MACHINE FOR LIVING IN Tutorial: What was modernism? Readings: Breuer, “The House Interior”, Fredrick, “The Labor-Saving Kitchen” Week 12: Thursday 26 October Lecture: MATERIALITY AND EXPERIENCE Tutorial: How do materials affect our experience of interior space? Reading: Pallasmaa, “An Architecture of the Seven Senses” 3 3 GENERAL NOTES ON THIS UNIT Lectures are delivered live each  Thursday  between 1:30 and 2:30 in AGSE 207 but tutorials will be conducted online at specific times on Thursday afternoons or Fridays – your specific time is on your timetable. You need not be physically on campus to participate in these online tutorials but you will need to be online for the full two hours. The overall success of this unit relies on your weekly participation in the online discussion threads and activities. This is your chance to reflect upon the lecture content and readings as well as your fellow students’ ideas. Each week, you are be expected to post replies to a discussion board in response to short tasks as well as add additional ideas, images, videos or web links relevant to the weekly topic. You must also respond to your fellow students’ posts. Remember, the more involved you get in discussions, the more dynamic and interesting our classes will be. ASSESSMENT 1. Online Debate – 30% of semester’s grade Submission Date: Wednesday 30 August by 5pm Submission: An illustrated 1500 word essay, submitted on Blackboard In weeks 2-4 of semester, we will be covering three “foundational” themes: Interiority, Dwelling, and Sacred Space. For this piece of assessment, you are to take ONE of these themes and form an original argument around one of the tutorial questions: -  Interiority: What is interiority? -  Dwelling: What is the relationship between humans and space? -  Sacred Space: What is a sacred space? To frame your argument, use either two precedents that we have discussed in class or two precedents that you have sourced from Ching, Jarzombek and Prakash’s A Global History of Architecture (see bibliography for details). As in a debate, your discussion of these two examples should provide two different (though not necessarily opposing) perspectives on this question. Focus your analysis of these examples on their interiors and remember to incorporate references to both the relevant weekly readings as well as additional research. Include diagrams tor images to illustrate your ideas. See books by Simon Unwin in the bibliography for examples of how to do this. Start reading and researching early to avoid last minute panic! 4 4 ONLINE DEBATE: Rubric Levels of Achievement Criteria Fail - N Pass - P Credit - C Distinction - D High Distinction - HD Overall argument Weight 25.00% 0 to 49 % No coherent introduction, conclusion or overall argument. 50 to 59 % Attempt at a introduction,

History of Interior Architecture DIA1000 代写 conclusion and overall argument with some reference to the examples. 60 to 69 % Coherent introduction and conclusion. Attempt at an argument with some references to the examples. 70 to 79 % Clear introduction and conclusion. Logical argument backed up with examples. 80 to 100 % Clear and original introduction and conclusion. Strong, logical argument backed up with examples. Precedent analysis Weight 25.00% 0 to 49 % Little analysis, little or no evidence of any research. 50 to 59 % Attempt at an analysis of the spaces, some research. 60 to 69 % Reasonable analysis of the spaces, reasonable research mostly appropriately used. 70 to 79 % Good analysis of the spaces, good research appropriately documented. 80 to 100 % Original analysis of the spaces, evidence of strong research documented and synthesized from various sources. Use of images/plans Weight 20.00% 0 to 49 % Minimal images, poor quality, no reference to them in the text. 50 to 59 % Includes images and/or plans, some reference to them in the text. 60 to 69 % Good quality graphics and/or plans, some reference to them in the text. 70 to 79 % Good quality graphics and/or plans, captioned and referenced in the text. 80 to 100 % Original and high- quality graphics and plans, clearly captioned and integrated into the text. Written expression and structure Weight 20.00% 0 to 49 % Unclear expression, no logical structure. 50 to 59 % Readable, attempt at a coherent structure. 60 to 69 % Reasonable structure and expression. 70 to 79 % Logical structure, good expression, and mostly original writing. 80 to 100 % Logical structure, formal academic expression, engaging and original writing. Research Weight 10.00% 0 to 49 % No evidence of any research. 50 to 59 % Only set texts and/or online sources. 60 to 69 % Use of some external sources, mostly correctly referenced. 70 to 79 % Use of a variety of sources, correctly referenced. 80 to 100 % Coverage of extensive and appropriate sources, correctly referenced. 5 5 2. Weekly Lecture Blog – 40% of semester’s grade Submission Date: Every Friday by 5pm from weeks 5-12 Submission: 8 blog entries, submitted to the Blackboard Weekly Reading Blog Each week during semester, one or two readings will provide a focus for our lecture and tutorials. For this assessment task, you are to submit a critical analysis of the weekly reading(s) from week 5 to week 12 on your own individual blog within Blackboard. This is 8 weeks’ worth of blog entries (so each is worth 5% of your grade). Your entry should comprise both a critical analysis of the reading(s) as well as at least one supporting image (which might be an example discussed in the reading or one you have found/created yourself). In any case you MUST acknowledge the source of this image and caption it accordingly. It should not be the first image that appears on Google Image Search, it should help support your argument. Your blog entry should reflect on the position of the writer (who has written the piece – a historian? an architect? a philosopher?), the main argument or points discussed by the author, what insight it has given you into the history of interiors, and how it might relate to your studio or other projects. Each entry need not be long (500 words maximum) but should display an engagement with the readings and ideas discussed in lectures and tutorials each week. Given these blogs will be open to everyone in this unit, you must also regularly read others’ blogs and comment on them. 6 6 WEEKLY LECTURE BLOG: Rubric Levels of Achievement Criteria Fail - N Pass - P Credit - C Distinction - D High Distinction - HD Ideas and Content Weight 30.00% 0 to 49 % Simple posts, lacking insight and depth. Entries are short and frequently irrelevant to the readings. 50 to 59 % Posts show some insight, depth and connection to the readings. Limited understanding of each week's topic. 60 to 69 % Posts display good insight and depth. The content of each is connected to the readings and examples discussed. 70 to 79 % Posts display insight, depth and understanding. All posts are relevant and expressed in an appropriate style. 80 to 100 % Posts display excellent insight, depth and understanding. All entries reference appropriate research and examples. Quality Weight 20.00% 0 to 49 % Posts are poor quality, missing and/or late. Little evidence of any reading or engaging with the weekly topic. 50 to 59 % Posts are consistent, but the writing is casual with a lack of engagement with the readings. 60 to 69 % Posts are clearly written and attempt to engage with the readings and topic for each week. 70 to 79 % Posts are well written and demonstrate good engagement with the readings and weekly topics. 80 to 100 % Posts are well written, and display evidence of strong understanding of the readings as well as original reflections. Voice Weight 20.00% 0 to 49 % Posts do not reflect an awareness of the audience nor is there any personality evident. 50 to 59 % Posts reflect a little personality but the word choices do not bring the topic to life. 60 to 69 % Posts are written in an appropriate tone and an attempt is made at a consistent voice. 70 to 79 % Posts are written in an appropriate style, the voice is consistent and engaging. 80 to 100 % Posts are written in a consistent and engaging style, the voice is original and the tone expressive. Graphics Weight 25.00% 0 to 49 % Little to no use of images or only low- quality images without captions or annotations. 50 to 59 % Selection of images variable with some good quality and some poor quality. Some captions and annotations. 60 to 69 % Good selection of images or other multi-media, most display appropriate captions or annotations. 70 to 79 % Good selection of images or other multi- media, all display appropriate captions or annotations. 80 to 100 % Thoughtful selection of images and other multi-media to enhance the text. Excellent integration of images and text. Citations Weight 5.00% 0 to 49 % No citations to either images or published works. 50 to 59 % Some images or written texts are appropriately cited in some posts. 60 to 69 % Images and written texts are appropriately cited in most posts. 70 to 79 % Images and written texts are appropriately cited. 80 to 100 % Images and written texts are appropriately cited. 7 7 3. Online Exam – 30% of semester’s grade Date: Wednesday November 1 – Friday November 3 (Week 13) The exam will take the form of an online, “open book” exam on Blackboard that you may take any time between Wednesday November 1 and Friday November 3. While it will only take approximately an hour to complete, you may complete the exam at any time during those three days. The exam will test your knowledge and understanding of the main themes and ideas we have covered this semester in the lecture program, the readings and in class discussions. The best way to study for this exam is to keep up with the weekly readings and tasks during semester, and then to review them again in the week or two before the exam. Of course, any additional reading you do on the topics covered during semester will help familiarise you with the exam material. You could begin with some of the titles below. BIBLIOGRAPHY History of Interior Design and Architecture: General Resources Abercrombie, S. 2003. A Century of Interior Design 1900–2000. New York: Rizzoli. Alfoldy, S. and Helland, J. 2008. Craft, Space and Interior Design: 1855-2005. Altershot: Ashgate. Brooker, G. and Stone, S. eds. 2012. From Organisation to Decoration: An Interior Design Reader, New York: Routledge. Ching, F. D. K., Jarzombek, M.M. and Prakash, V. 2011. A Global History of Architecture, 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Fisher, F., Keeble, T., Lara-Betancourt, P. and Martin, B., eds., 2011. Performance, Fashion and the Modern Interior, Oxford and New York: Berg. Ireland, J. 2009. History of Interior Design. New York: Fairchild Books. Massey, A. 1990. Interior Design since 1900. London: Thames & Hudson. McKellar, S. and Sparke, P. 2004. Interior Design and Identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Pile, J. and Gura, J. 2013. A History of Interior Design, 4th edn. London: Lawrence King. Poldma, Tiiu, ed., 2013. Meanings of Designed Spaces, New York: Fairchild Books. Rice. C. 2007. The Emergence of the Interior: Architecture, Modernity, Domesticity. London and New York: Routledge. Sparke, P. 2008. The Modern Interior. London: Reaktion Books. Sparke, P., Massey, A., Keeble, T. and Martin, B., eds. 2009. Designing the Modern Interior: from the Victorians to Today, Oxford and New York: Berg. Taylor, M. and Preston, J. eds. 2006. Intimus: Interior Design Theory Reader. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Academy. Taylor, M., ed. 2013. Interior Design and Architecture: Critical and Primary Sources (4 Volumes), London: Bloomsbury. Unwin, S., Analysing Architecture, Routledge, London, 2009 (see companion website at: http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415489287/) Unwin, S., Exercises in Architecture, Routledge, London, 2012 (see companion website at: http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/9780415489287/) Unwin, S., Twenty Buildings Every Architect Should Understand, Routledge, London, 2010 Weinthal, L., 2011. Toward a New Interior: An Anthology of Interior Design Theory. New 8 8 York: Princeton Architectural Press. WHAT IS INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE? Sanders, J. 2002. “Curtain Wars”, Harvard Design Review, issue 16: http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/16/curtain-wars Abercrombie, S. 1990. Philosophy of Interior Design. New York: Harper & Row. Lefebvre, H., 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Rice, C. 2004. “Rethinking Histories of the Interior”, Journal of Architecture, 9:3, 275-287. DWELLING Heidegger, M. 2011. Basic Writings, Routledge, London. Norberg-Schulz, C. 1979. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture, New York: Rizzoli. Sharr, Adam 2007, Heidegger for architects, Routledge, London SACRED SPACE Vitruvius, The Ten Books of Architecture – full text available at Project Gutenberg. Kostof, Spiro 2010, A history of architecture: settings and rituals, International 2nd ed, Oxford University Press, New York HOUSE I: THE DOMESTIC INTERIOR Blunt, A. and Dowling, R. 2006, Home, Taylor and Francis, Hoboken, NJ. Parissien, S. 2009. Interiors: The Home Since 1700. London: Lawrence King. Rybczynski, W. 1986. Home: the Short History of an Idea, Penguin, London and New York. TRADITIONS: NATIONAL, REGIONAL, LOCAL (AUSTRALIA) Avery, T. 2007. “Furniture Design and Colonialism: Negotiating Relationships between Britain and Australia, 1880-1901”, Home Cultures, 4:1, 69-92. Boyd, R. Australia’s Home: Its Origins, Builders and Occupiers, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, 1952. Stephen, A., McNamara, A., and Goad, P. 2006. Modernism and Australia: Documents on Art, Design and Architecture 1917-1967, The Miegunyah Press, Melbourne. TRADITIONS: CULTURAL AND CROSS-CULTURAL (JAPAN) Daniels, I. 2010. The Japanese House: Material Culture in the Modern Home. Oxford and New York: Berg. Kashiwagi, H. 2000. On Rationalization and the National Lifestyle: Japanese Design of the 1920s and 1930s. In Tipton E. and Clark, J. Being Modern in Japan: Culture and Society from the 1910s to the 1930s. Canberra: Humanities Research Foundation. Sand, Jordan. 2005. House and Home in Modern Japan: Architecture, Domestic Space, and Bourgeois Culture, 1880-1930. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center. Teasley, Sarah. 2003. Furnishing the Modern Metropolitan: Moriya Nobuo’s Designs for Domestic Interiors, 1922-1927. Design Issues 19:4, 57-71. HOUSE II: MEANING, SYMBOLISM AND NARRATIVES Bachelard, G. 1994 (1958). The Poetics of Space. Trans. M. Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press. Sparke, P. 2008. The Modern Interior. London: Reaktion Books. 9 9 Sparke, P., Massey, A., Keeble, T. and Martin, B., eds. 2009. Designing the Modern Interior: from the Victorians to Today, Oxford and New York: Berg. INDIGENOUS SPACE Memmott, P., ed. 2003. Housing Design In Indigenous Australia, Royal Australian Institute of Architects, Canberra. Memmott, P. 2007. Gunyah, Goondie + Wurley: the Aboriginal Architecture of Australia, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, Qld. Read, P., ed. 2000, Settlement: A History of Australian Indigenous Housing, Aboriginal Studies Press, Canberra. POLITICAL SPACE Dovey, K. 1999. Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form, Routledge, London. Ellin, N. ed. 1997. Architecture of Fear, Princeton Architecture Press, New York. Jones, P. 2011. The Sociology of Architecture: Constructing Identities, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool. Marcello, F., “Italians do it Better: Fascist Italy’s New Brand of Nationalism in the Art and Architecture of the Italian Pavilion, Paris 1937” in Rika Devos, Alexander Ortenberg, Vladimir Paperny eds., Architecture of Great Expositions 1937-1958: Reckoning with the Global War, Ashgate Press, 2015, 51-69. HOUSE III: A MACHINE FOR LIVING IN Colomina, B. 1998. Privacy and Publicity: Modern Architecture as Mass Media. Cambridge, MA, and London: The MIT Press. Sparke, P. 2008. The Modern Interior. London: Reaktion Books. Sparke, P. et al, eds. 2009. Designing the Modern Interior: From the Victorians to Today. London and New York: Berg Publishers. Le Corbusier. 1986. Towards a New Architecture. New York: Dover Publications. MATERIALITY AND EXPERIENCE Bachelard, G. 1994 (1958). The Poetics of Space. Trans. M. Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press. De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press. Holl, S., Pallasmaa, J. and Perez-Gomez, A. 1994. Questions of Perception: Phenomenology of Architecture. Tokyo: A+U Publications. Pallasmaa, J. 2005. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chitchester: Wiley and Sons. Tuan, Y. 1979. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. JOURNALS: access through the Swinburne Library website Interiors (Bloomsbury Publishers) Home Cultures (Bloomsbury Publishers) Journal of Interior Design (Wiley Publishers) IDEA (Interior Design Educators Association) journal Architectural Theory Review (Routledge) The Journal of Architecture (Routledge) Grey Room (MIT Press) Space and Culture (Sage Publishers) History of Interior Architecture DIA1000 代写