Data Base Management Systems代写

Assignment (20%) Due: Friday (15/01/2016) in week 8 Submit your assignment to Moodle (Link to submit assignment is available at the top of the course Moodle site) General Information and requirement You need to reference external material other than the text in order to complete this assignment successfully. ALL use of external sources must be cited in Harvard format. Plagiarism detection will be used in this assessment. Requirements In this assignment, you must produce a brief literature review related to the following topic: As in all areas of information technology. Data Base Management Systems (DBMSs) are constantly changing and improving. Research how businesses are using DBMSs, and write a report of your findings. Address the following issues: 1. Which popular DBMS products are based on the relational data model? 2. Which DBMS products are based on a logical model other than the relational data model? 3. What are the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different types (relational versus other logical models) of DBMSs? Your submission should cite at least five references. All references should be academic (journal and conference papers or edited book chapters) and as contemporaneous as possible (no more than 7 years old). What you need to submit You are required to submit a single document of around 2500 to 3000 words in Microsoft Word format (.doc or .docx). Assessment Criteria Marking Criteria  Mark  Mark Literature Review  Range  Given Limited or no literature reviewed; poorly discussed and summarized; little or no linkage or relevance to the topic. 0 - 4 Adequate literature reviewed; reasonable discussion and summary; linkage or relevance of the paper to the topic could be clearer. 5 - 10 Extensive and/or well targeted literature selection; good discussion and summary where topic linkage and relevance is clearly established. Understanding of the literature is clearly demonstrated 11 - 15 Clarity of Expression  Review poorly written and/or concepts and ideas are not clearly communicated 0 - 2 The review is written to an acceptable standard and ideas and concepts are communicated effectively 3 - 4 The review is extremely well written. It is concise, yet ideas and concepts are communicated exceptionally well 5 Referencing (deduction of 1 per error to maximum of 5) deduction:  Note: this criteria relates to citation format or omission errors (i.e. source appears in reference list but not cited or not cited correctly). Plagiarism (unreferenced/copied) material will result in a referral to Head of School for further action. Severe penalties apply should plagiarism be proven. TOTAL  0 - 20